help me decide what photos to process good ، help me decide what photos to process good
i want to start going through some photos from an old shoot
but i cant decide where to start
these ones were shortlisted by the model
i think 5 and 16 for sure,
maybe 12 as well
Source of
http://forums.offtopic.com/
تســــلمينِ غآليتيِ
tamron 17-50mm or canon 17-40L — help decide good ، tamron 17-50mm or canon 17-40L — help decide good
I’ve pretty much narrowed it down to these two choices.
Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 non VC:
Pros:
– Less expensive ($450 new)
– f/2.8
– Sharp
– 6 year warranty
Cons:
– Hit or miss build quality?
– How much do I trust tamron’s warranty anyway?
– Noisy / iffy autofocus?
– Will lose value when used, and don’t really want to buy used because of warranty
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L
Pros:
– Solid build quality
– Sharp
– Holds value like a boss
– Only ~500-600 used
– USM
Cons:
– Only f/4
– More limited range, although it’s not a huge deal
Right now I’m leaning towards the tamron but I’d like some more input. I’ve used the canon but not the tamron. I am open to other options but I don’t want to spend much more than $500 so the canon 17-55 f/2.8 is out of the question although I want it.
Source of
http://forums.offtopic.com/
يســــلمؤِ غنآإِتيِ
يســــلمؤِ غنآإِتيِ
Can’t decide on camera / lens good ، Can’t decide on camera / lens good
I sold my XTi after owning it for 4 years this past week. Also sold the lens I had (18-135 IS 3.6-5, i think). Still have my 50mm prime 1.8.
Thinking of buying a 60D if Amazon’s 100$ additional discount comes back ($900 :bowdown:). I can’t seem to decide on a lens.
It would be for a walk around lens. I usually take photos either indoors, or landscapes / out with family. Once I got the 50prime, i barely used the 18-135 due to the weight, size, and never the need (in my case) for the extra zoom. Not for professional pictures by any standards. I know my shitty skills 🙂
I’m thinking between these two lenses:
Canon 17-40mm f4L (http://www.amazon.com/Canon-17-40mm-…2694393&sr=8-1)
Canon 17-55mm f2.8 IS (http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EF-S-17-…2694393&sr=8-2)
The con’s i’ve read about the 17-55 are a lower build quality, price for a non L.
I’d love a 16-35 2.8L, but can’t justify the cost. Want to keep the total below 2k.
Source of
http://forums.offtopic.com/
يســـــلمؤِ يآلغلآ
Decide my next lens purchase! Before lunch! good ، Decide my next lens purchase! Before lunch! good
Here’s what I own:
Nikon 14-24mm 2.8
Tamron 28-75
Nikon 85mm 1.4g
Nikon 50mm 1.8D
Tamron 90mm macro
nikon 80-200mm 2.8
The 50 is fucked. Not sharp at all, been dropped a bunch of times. Still works though. Got a couple of nice shots with it at the wedding I just shot…
Considering upgrading that to the 50mm 1.4.
Also considering the 28mm 1.8
Do I really need a 28mm if I already have the 14-24? Is it possible for the 28 to be sharper than the 24? Prolly not…
What about a 35mm f2? halfway between the 24 and the 50?
This will be a $500 or less purchase, so these are the lenses i’m considering:
Sigma or Nikon 50mm 1.4
Sigma 28mm 1.8
Nikon 35mm f2D
Go.
مشكوره
Thank you
